• From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:01:15 +0100

I note that the requirements all seem to focus on print requirements,
if this is the case maybe it would be mean that XSL-FO 2.0 would
remove the non-print parts of the specification?

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Liam Quin <liam@w...> wrote:
> The W3C XSL Working Group has published a requirements document
>  for the Extensible Stylesheet Language (XSL) Version 2.0 [1],
>  along with a Survey to ask potential implementors and users for
>  feedback on the relative importance of the proposed new features.
>
>
>  Liam
>
>  (W3C staff contact/participant, XSL-FO)
>
>  [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xslfo20-req-20080326/
>
>  --
>  Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
>  http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
>
>  _______________________________________________________________________
>
>  XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
>  to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
>  spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
>  [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
>  Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
>  subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
>  List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>  List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>

• References:
  • [ANN] XSL-FO 2.0 requirements published
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>