• From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
• To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
• Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 16:45:36 +0100

I do not believe that Schematron bound to XPath 2.0 will have the
functionality of being deterministic. :)

Not sure if I really care that much. I think being declarative is the
main requirement.


Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen




On Nov 9, 2007 2:26 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@m...> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Is Schematron (using XPath 2.0) functionally a superset of XML Schemas?
>
> Using XPath 2.0, Schematron can now perform all of the grammar-type
> checks that XML Schemas does, e.g. check that the correct tags are
> being used, the tags are arranged properly, and the datatypes of each
> element and attribute are correct.
>
> Plus Schematron can perform co-constraint checks, cardinality checks,
> and algorithmic checks that XML Schemas cannot do.
>
> Are there things that XML Schemas can do that Schematron (using Xpath
> 2.0) cannot do?
>
> /Roger
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>

• References:
  • Is Schematron (using XPath 2.0) functionally a superset of XML Schemas?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>