• From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:59:49 +0300

Ioana,

>> DT>> Let i guess: you define SQL as matching to template
>> DT>> 'EnglishWord Parameter EnglishWord Parameter EnglishWord Parameter', i.e.
>> DT>> 'select      ...       from        ...       where       ...',       and nothing else.
IM> May I please suggest that you continue your exchange with Jonathan
IM> offline (separately from the xml-dev list)?
IM> (It's just my suggestion - perhaps the conversation is still useful to
IM> you, in which case of course it will continue.)
I'd like to listen:
(1) is my DDL- and DML-proposals usefull (non notes till now)
(2) is TML more convenient, than XQuery ('no' never sounds).
    I'd like, that people compare their XQuery with examples on
    http://sql50.euro.ru/site/sql50/en/author/wave_eng.htm

If answer #2 is yes, than i'd like to understand two things:
(2.1) why people argue by so, that it's possible to make in other way
      [i.e. by XQuery]
(2.2) why people is hold by old BNF before usability.


Dmitry Turin
SQL5      (5.5.0)  http://sql50.euro.ru
HTML6     (6.4.3)  http://html60.euro.ru
Unicode7  (7.2.0)  http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2.0.2)  http://computer20.euro.ru

• References:
  • Re[6]: SQL5
    • From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
  • Re: Re[6]: SQL5
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
  • Re[8]: SQL5
    • From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
  • Re: SQL5
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re[2]: SQL5
    • From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
  • Re: SQL5
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...>
  • Re[2]: SQL5
    • From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>