• From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:26:29 +0300

Jonathan,

>> Let i guess: you define SQL as matching to template
>> 'EnglishWord Parameter EnglishWord Parameter EnglishWord Parameter', i.e.
>> 'select      ...       from        ...       where       ...',  and nothing else.
JR> Well, there's a BNF that defines SQL
People define SQL instead of BNF.
As i already said, i propose to overrun today's boundary.

JR> I don't think Rick Marshall defined SQL, I suspect that H2 does that.
  Jonathan, i don't want to offend you, but you forge concept:
RM>> Don't call it SQL - it's simply not.
DT>> Arguments are absent again.
DT>> Let i guess: you define SQL as matching to template
DT>> 'EnglishWord Parameter EnglishWord Parameter EnglishWord Parameter', i.e.
DT>> 'select      ...       from        ...       where       ...',       and nothing else.
Speach was about reason of you _own_ opinion,
about how you define SQL for _youself_,
about how you will vote (or would vote, or might could vote) in organization of standartization.


Dmitry Turin
SQL5      (5.5.0)  http://sql50.euro.ru
HTML6     (6.4.3)  http://html60.euro.ru
Unicode7  (7.2.0)  http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2.0.2)  http://computer20.euro.ru

• References:
  • Re[6]: SQL5
    • From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
  • Re: Re[6]: SQL5
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
  • Re[8]: SQL5
    • From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
  • Re: SQL5
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re[2]: SQL5
    • From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
  • Re: SQL5
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...>