• From: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:11:42 -0400

At 03:12 PM 9/27/2006, Ari Krupnik wrote:
>I would be very interested in your draft. Perhaps you would consider
>posing a shorter version, a working abstract so to speak, sooner? I
>know a lot more people will read a 2-page draft than a 40-page
>document. Also, the discussion will be fresher in their minds the
>sooner you publish a draft.

         Writing it out is helping me to work out the bugs in my 
head. I've already caught myself making a number of mistakes in my 
conceptualization. However, the document is large because it contains 
numerous examples. I imagine it'll be a relatively easy read for 
people used to wading through W3C specs.

         In other words...anything I put in an abstract now will 
probably be wrong, since I'm using the document to work out the ideas.

--->Ben 

• References:
  • Re: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo
    • From: "David Lyon" <david.lyon@p...>
  • RE: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • XML-DEV list: was [RE: convert dom4j.Document to net.sf.saxon.om.NodeInfo]
    • From: peter murray-rust <pm286@c...>
  • Re: XML-DEV list
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@p...>
  • Re: XML-DEV list
    • From: Ari Krupnik <ari@c...>