• To: "peter murray-rust" <pm286@c...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:49:18 -0500
• In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.0.20060723100223.03e64260@c...>
• Thread-index: AcauO6+FIypnclk1Qhi2hR1ZFLo13AA6WAHw
• Thread-topic: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?

http://hcilab.uniud.it/let-web3d/x3d-intro.pdf

See slide 12.  I realize you mean a "CML client" but this is a good idea
too.

XML is on the visible web.  Some won't look.

It's a pity really, because as is often the case, change and innovation
are coming from the edges of the network, and HTML is now the Gorgon in
the center.

len 


From: peter murray-rust [mailto:pm286@c...] 

CML is not a toy. 

What we do not have is a stable environment to put them in. We cannot
rely on the browsers to provide the environment. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
    • From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>

• References:
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: peter murray-rust <pm286@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
• Next by Date: RE: client side XML functionalities
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better..
• Next by thread: RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread