• To: "'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <len.bullard@i...>,'peter murray-rust' <pm286@c...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:14:39 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <7411F30464DC9C479FB14CFD348D71D996C51B@U...>

Hi Len,

Len mentioned:
http://hcilab.uniud.it/let-web3d/x3d-intro.pdf

See slide 12.  I realize you mean a "CML client" but this is a good idea
too.

Didier replies:
Jee Len, you're right, a CML interpreter would be better to use web3d
because most chemical compounds are definitively better viewed in 3D. So
Peter a missing part for your tool is a 3D viewer. Sounds like web3d is a
better candidate than SVG.

Cheers
Didier PH Martin

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>

• References:
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality
• Next by Date: RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality
• Previous by thread: RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
• Next by thread: RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread