• To: "Greg Alvord" <greg.alvord@c...>
• Subject: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
• From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:18:30 +0200
• Cc: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Xb0+xS0aTlOIv6cOabolqsNhuvQ8Tli1vadSUQNWP6vRWzCC83WcG3XbwLdC7fAADrq5eyA3ZxiOYtMUSqgc2MC2b1QWQLYnhkmwNwjX01vpmKTWyQ2zftAPgeexdND8YpGifrKsRX9AzKFBjgecipx1yjXE+obTdcT43pLHH7Y=
• In-reply-to: <001901c6a8dc$ac772a00$6401a8c0@YOUR7648F3E7A0>
• References: <B8415163A689094689542C617ECA0366DA608D@I...> <001901c6a8dc$ac772a00$6401a8c0@YOUR7648F3E7A0>

> Semantic question, if the XSLT transform is performed on the Web server or
> other another middle server in the production path of the making the visible
> page is the XML use Visible or Hidden? The end result is the same visible
> XHTML.  It is no more hidden from the end user than the HTML is hidden by
> the rendering of the browser.
>

I would say visible if there is a way to lead back from the XHTML to
the source XML.


Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

• References:
  • Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
    • From: "Greg Alvord" <greg.alvord@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
• Next by Date: [ANN] XML Studio v6-- Web 2.0, Enterprise XML, and Mobile Internettool unification
• Previous by thread: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
• Next by thread: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread