• To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
• Subject: Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
• From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:15:23 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cxz2EmnIugnct5xUGgN2HHK3yYfgFWAFgutyGFQHSBNaRWFDXhwTCtQXTq7JVEmBzThh6vKgqP8fKsh4lCVvMeJr0h/irIfJQc6J4KEFqtc8dlbUO7C1p5A4FPA+hLKo2EIenYN0TeVd/VutvMFqIHEzzac+91Je8lx6df1KCzk=
• In-reply-to: <3bb44c6e0607180100n7f54b639wb23b0efb79e3f15d@m...>
• References: <B8415163A689094689542C617ECA0366DA608D@I...> <B8415163A689094689542C617ECA0366DA6267@I...> <3bb44c6e0607180100n7f54b639wb23b0efb79e3f15d@m...>

I suppose that the argument that the visible web is most important
when abstracted is an argument that non-technical end users are the
most important.

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

On 7/18/06, bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@g...> wrote:
> given
> > ASSERTION #10
> >
> >
> >
> > Your information is most valuable when available on the visible Web.
> >
> >
>
> then
> > ASSERTION #11
> >
> >
> >
> > Web services are part of the hidden Web, and thus obsessing over their
> > nature (e.g., SOAP versus REST) is not valuable.
> >
>
> raises argument:
>
> Web services argument is not about knowledge as value, but about
> process as  value. The Rest argument is basically that the SOAP
> process is wasteful and thus destructive of value
> ( the Soap argument seems to have something to do with how cool 18
> wheelers are but I have not as yet been able to understand it )
>
> :)
>
>  However the REST argument also is that one uses the same underlying
> technology stack that is used to facilitate the Visible web, if at
> some point the hidden web should be moved to the visible web using
> REST means that one is in a potentially better position to do so.
>
> Cheers,
> Bryan Rasmussen
>

• References:
  • Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
• Next by Date: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
• Next by thread: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread