• To: 'Rick Jelliffe' <rjelliffe@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:06:04 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <44C4A919.6080806@a...>

Hello Rick,

Rick Said:
Or is it to make some new API that abstracts 
out the safe parts from existing browser's plugin API? Or is it a 
distribution problem: do we need to start thinking in terms of browser 
distributions that are like Linux distributions: all optioned up from 
the outset?

Didier replies:
Thanks god Rick. Off course it has to be that way like it is for any other
software. It's funny that we have to say these things. The browser world was
a real Maya (illusion) and it seems that developers are slowly going out of
the trance.

Cheers
Didier PH Martin

• References:
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality
• Next by Date: RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality
• Previous by thread: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
• Next by thread: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread