• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality
• From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:04:04 -0400
• In-reply-to: <44C47FED.5020609@g...>
• References: <B8415163A689094689542C617ECA0366E03F8C@I...> <7.0.1.0.0.20060723192020.04435ec0@c...> <44C3EC97.2020302@m...> <44C47FED.5020609@g...>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060530)

Julian Reschke wrote:

> 3. Does the XSLT implementation have a fully working node-set extension 
> (AFAIK right now, only IE does).

I don't find that especially necessary.


> 4. Are there any plans to upgrade the browser engine to XSLT 2.0 (AFAIK, 
>  nobody is planning that, and I'd really like to understand why).

Ditto. Plain-vanilla XSLT 1 seems perfectly adequate for pretty much all 
browser use cases. They're a few things that are easier in XSLT 2, but 
very little important you can't do in XSLT 1.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@m...
Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality
    • From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>
  • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality
    • From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>

• References:
  • [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • CLAX - Client-side functionality
    • From: peter murray-rust <pm286@c...>
  • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality
    • From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
• Next by Date: RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• Previous by thread: Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality
• Next by thread: RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread