• To: XML Dev ML <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
• From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@i...>
• Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:16:34 +0300
• In-reply-to: <3090.217.124.69.247.1152970264.squirrel@w...>
• References: <D1EFB337111B674B8F1BE155B01C6DD601063C7D@f...> <3090.217.124.69.247.1152970264.squirrel@w...>

On Jul 15, 2006, at 16:31, <juanrgonzaleza@c...>  
<juanrgonzaleza@c...> wrote:

> The WHATWG specification
...
> and MathML was strongly rejected and after eliminated (recom.) from  
> the spec.

I think the readers of xml-dev shouldn't jump to any conclusions  
based on Juan R.'s characterization of the discussion on the WHAT WG  
list.

For those who are actually interested in looking at the archives, the  
subject of the thread is "Mathematics on HTML5" and it spans May and  
June in the WHAT WG mailing list archives:
http://listserver.dreamhost.com/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@i...
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...>

• References:
  • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
    • From: "Paul Topping" <pault@d...>
  • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
    • From: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?
• Next by Date: Announce: XPontus XML Editor 1.0.0RC1
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
• Next by thread: Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread