• To: "Bullard, Claude L ((Len))" <len.bullard@i...>
• Subject: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:03:09 +0200
• Cc: "xml-dev@l... Developers" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <7411F30464DC9C479FB14CFD348D71D97BBA91@U...>
• References: <7411F30464DC9C479FB14CFD348D71D97BBA91@U...>

On Jun 30, 2006, at 17:36, Bullard, Claude L ((Len)) wrote:
> Replacement of a ubiquitously deployed technology is expensive too.
>
> No free lunch.  As my managers say, show me the numbers. (not just the
> costs of the software because that is by far the cheaper of the bits
> that have to be redone).

I'm not suggesting replacing -- XML Schema is a good way of  
describing things that have only remote connections with XML, such as  
object systems, people that are happy with it should stick to it.

But as a user confronted with the choice between a number of systems,  
given a choice between using a solution that offer RelaxNG and one  
that offers XML Schema, I'll pick the former with my eyes closed as I  
know it'll cut my costs (and having jumped through the hoops of using  
XML Schema, I have a notion of what those costs are).

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>

• References:
  • RE: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Next by Date: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Previous by thread: RE: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Next by thread: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread