• To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:13:01 +0100
• Cc: "Bullard, Claude L ((Len))" <len.bullard@i...>, "xml-dev@l... Developers" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <ABAEF25D-573A-44BA-B8B9-7540FA85463D@e...>
• References: <7411F30464DC9C479FB14CFD348D71D97BBA91@U...> <ABAEF25D-573A-44BA-B8B9-7540FA85463D@e...>
• Reply-to: davep@d...

On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 18:03 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote:

> But as a user confronted with the choice between a number of systems,  
> given a choice between using a solution that offer RelaxNG and one  
> that offers XML Schema, I'll pick the former with my eyes closed as I  
> know it'll cut my costs (and having jumped through the hoops of using  
> XML Schema, I have a notion of what those costs are).
And as cost conscious managers employ cheaper labour....
   Relaxng is a no brainer.
It's readable.
It's documentable.
It's generatable. (Sorry Len the English is going)
It's designed by two people I|We(??) have a lot of respect for.
It's a winner.

The only thing xsd is good for is showing how not to do it.


-- 
Regards, 

Dave Pawson
XSLT + Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: David Carver <d_a_carver@y...>
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>

• References:
  • RE: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Next by Date: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Previous by thread: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Next by thread: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread