• To: Michael Champion <michael.champion@h...>
• Subject: Re: W3C Launches Incubator Activity
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:34:47 +0100
• Cc: "XML Developers List" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <BAY114-W2825BF632CBD52667B37799020@p...>
• References: <BAY114-W2825BF632CBD52667B37799020@p...>

On Feb 10, 2006, at 22:42, Michael Champion wrote:
> XBC did quite a decent job of defining the requirements for the EXI  
> WG, but didn't even attempt to develop a spec.

Correction: at the time of XBC's creation, it corresponded to the  
then idea of an XG. Text from the proposals for XGs that were  
floating around back then went directly into the charter.

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/

• References:
  • RE: Re: W3C Launches Incubator Activity
    • From: "Michael Champion" <michael.champion@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Status of ISO Schematron
• Next by Date: Re: Validation - Is it worth it ?
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: W3C Launches Incubator Activity
• Next by thread: 2SimpleXML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread