• To: "XML Developers List" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Re: W3C Launches Incubator Activity
• From: "Michael Champion" <michael.champion@h...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:42:10 -0800

> CC: xml-dev@l...
> From: robin.berjon@e...
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:21:08 +0100
> To: michael.champion@h...
> Subject: Re: W3C Launches Incubator Activity

> XBC was EXI's XG.

How does that square with:

"To expedite transition to the Recommendation Track, the XG should address the criteria listed in the Process Document for http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/activities.html#BPCreation and http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/groups.html#ReqsAllGroups, and the advice in http://www.w3.org/2002/05/rec-tips. The most important of these include:

• Develop a single, largely complete specification or guideline
• Build consensus around this specification or guideline within the community of interested organizations
• ..."

XBC did quite a decent job of defining the requirements for the EXI WG, but didn't even attempt to develop a spec. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: W3C Launches Incubator Activity
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2SimpleXML
• Next by Date: Re: 2SimpleXML
• Previous by thread: RE: W3C Launches Incubator Activity
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Launches Incubator Activity
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread