|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Use of UTF-8 and UTF-16
> or is there ever a good reason to specify > which to use other than for document size reasons? If all your tools are real XML tools then clearly no, because as you say both must be supported. But if you suspect that at some point someone might be tempted to edit using a "legacy" text editor or grep or sed or some such, then utf-8 has the advantages that it is designed to have: the character stream appears to such a tool to be "safe" 8bit input. The characters themselves will of course be mis-interpreted, but if you are making structural re-arrangements, you can process (on a good day:-) such a file without breaking the utf-8 encoding and the result can then be read by a real XML system that understands that. Conversely utf-16 tends to look to such 8-bit apps as if every other byte is 0 (If the text is English, and even if not, all XML syntax characters are in the ascii range, so you always get a lot of byte 0). So basically a utf-16 file implies that you are more committed to unicode-aware applications. Whether or not that is a good thing depends on politics as much as anything:-) David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








