|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Use of UTF-8 and UTF-16
I see many XML-based interoperability projects that specify whether to use UTF-8 or UTF-16 for Unicode character encoding. One will usually result in smaller documents/messages that the other (broadly, UTF-8 is better if the character set is mainly ASCII, and UTF-16 is better otherwise). However, I see no reason to specify this in terms of interoperability since XML processors must support both. Obviously, if you are using encodings other than these, they will need to be specified. Am I being stupid here (after all, it is Friday afternoon), or is there ever a good reason to specify which to use other than for document size reasons? Paul Spencer
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Cast Your Vote
We need your help – Vote for DataDirect XML Products!
Winners and finalists announced at SOA World Conference in November. Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||







