[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0

• To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Subject: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• From: Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@e...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:20:49 -0400
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <43065DCE.6010404@m...>
• Mail-followup-to: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>,XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072072A0@h...> <43065DCE.6010404@m...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

* Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> [2005-08-19 18:31]:

> I can think of numerous other cases where the problems with a spec were 
> blatant, obvious, and actively acknowledged by the community, in which 
> probably half of the people considering the spec believed it to be 
> fundamentally flawed, and yet it advanced to REC anyway (Namespaces, 
> schemas, XForms). In the first two cases, I think experience has shown 
> the doubters to be correct. The jury's still out on the third.

    This is the second time in this thread I've seen it written that
    Namespaces are flawed. Please point me to a disucssion or
    article that will illustrate the flaws in Namespaces. I'd like
    to read up so I can continue to follow along.

    Thank you.

--
Alan Gutierrez - alan@e...
    - http://engrm.com/blogometer/index.html
    - http://engrm.com/blogometer/rss.2.0.xml

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE:Namespaces are flawed
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>

• References:
  • RE: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by Date: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread