Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0
* Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...> [2005-08-19 18:31]: > I can think of numerous other cases where the problems with a spec were > blatant, obvious, and actively acknowledged by the community, in which > probably half of the people considering the spec believed it to be > fundamentally flawed, and yet it advanced to REC anyway (Namespaces, > schemas, XForms). In the first two cases, I think experience has shown > the doubters to be correct. The jury's still out on the third. This is the second time in this thread I've seen it written that Namespaces are flawed. Please point me to a disucssion or article that will illustrate the flaws in Namespaces. I'd like to read up so I can continue to follow along. Thank you. -- Alan Gutierrez - alan@e... - http://engrm.com/blogometer/index.html - http://engrm.com/blogometer/rss.2.0.xml
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format