• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Subject: RE: Another XML parsing idea? Was: Re: XMLHangover)
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:58:08 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <112128580851032706@hermes>

> A protocol implies sending and receiving messages typically across a process
> boundary or even a machine boundary. This would raise the cost of XML
> parsing by a couple of orders of magnitude.

Depends on the network layout.  If the XML source-stream comes directly to
the application, then you're probably right.  But if the source-stream
goes through an intermediary, then you're probably not.
	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html

• Prev by Date: Re: css syntax - easy question
• Next by Date: RE: Another XML parsing idea? Was: Re: XML Hangover)
• Previous by thread: Re: Another XML parsing idea? Was: Re: XML Hangover)
• Next by thread: [podcast] Bourret, Florescu, Kay, Robie, Rys discuss XQuery, native XML databases, SQL/XML databases
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread