• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: Interestingpair of comments
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:29:47 -0700
• In-reply-to: <0a0601c5894a$db89bef0$4800000a@objsys1>
• References: <20050715083428.A823D48275@m...> <42D798CD.2020108@m...> <0a0601c5894a$db89bef0$4800000a@objsys1>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

The obvious case is the ability to edit documents (such as XHTML 
documents) using a schema-specific set of objects. The problem is that 
current OO languages don't support constructs that would make this easy 
to do. Not that I'm saying I know what those would be, either...

-- Ron

Ed Day wrote:
> I am having a hard time accepting the case for mixed content, especially
> based on the arguments I have seen.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: Interesting pair of comments
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <Uche.Ogbuji@f...>
  • Global Complex Types vs. Global Elements
    • From: "Collin Hsu" <collin@w...>

• References:
  • Re: Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: Interestingpair of comments
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: Interesting pair of comments
    • From: "Ed Day" <eday@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: namespace URI of xmlns prefix
• Next by Date: RE: Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: Interesting pair of comments
• Previous by thread: Re: Mixed content in data-binding (Was: Re: Interesting pair of comments
• Next by thread: Global Complex Types vs. Global Elements
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread