Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Michael Kay wrote: > <email>fred@s...<last-modified>2005-02-02</last-modified></email> I don't like this example. As I see it the natural interpretation of this construct is that the e-mail address is fred@s...2005-02-02. I don't think this is a good use of a mixed content. I would write this construct as: <email>fred@s...</email> <last-modified>2005-02-02</last-modified> Here what's needed is better support for sibling elements. A better example might be: <email><username>fred</username>@<host>somewhere.com</host></email> Here the username element contains exactly and only the username; the host element contains exactly and only the host; and the email element contains exactly and only the email address. This would be even more compelling with street addresses, where many different unplanned things can show up as part of the address in a different country, and where the boundary whitespace might be used to format the address when printed on an envelope. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@m... XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
|
