Re: Another Microsoft XML patent
On 6/6/05, Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@e...> wrote: > This notion of mututually assured distruction is one that > interests me. If frivolous patent infringment claims are met > with like frivolous patent infringment claims, it makes the > pursuit of such litigation unprofitable. Yes, I was thinking of the nuclear analogy. It's true that among major powers, nobody can write a hundred lines of interesting code without infringing a patent, but nobody can sue for infringement because they also infringe some other patents. A serious patent war would set off the Doomsday Machine. (Actually, massive cross licensing is the norm AFAIK so the Doomsday Machine is pretty well deactivated among big companies). BUT there are a bunch of companies that have nothing but patents to sell (the ballistic missile submarines), so it's hard to strike back, and a bunch of companies such as The SCO Group (the North Koreas) that have destroyed themselves so thoroughly that there's not much point in threatening to finish the job. That's what everyone worries about -- random attacks from the un-deterrable -- not the legal equivalent of World War III. > > If the USPTO does issue patents for ideas that are not original, > or are quite obivous, I wounldn't mind so much, if they were > handing them out at a price that individuals and small firms > could afford. But there are plenty of small firms with "nuclear" patents. That's why I mentioned the small company which used patent greenmail against Symantec for $62.5M. > I've often thought of some sort of patent union for small > firms, open source developers, a treaty organization. It would probably be inappropriate for me to comment, but that's consistent with my point in jumping into this thread: Don't see the patent wars in good vs evil terms, but in strategic terms. Until there is World Peace (global patent reform and highly competent examiners as the norm) it makes little sense for any one power to give up their nukes, i.e. by not aggressively filing for patents on plausible inventions. Even if a group of major powers disarmed, the rogue states and terrorists with missile submarines :-) could still raise havoc. But remember that there are a lot of forces besides competing patents keeping Big Companies from nuking the little guys, including corporate image, antitrust law, the ability of governments to change all sorts of laws to punish companies that afflict their constituents, and so on. Sorry for flogging this nuclear analogy so hard :-)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format