[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Another Microsoft XML patent

microsoft agent in java
* Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...> [2005-06-05 23:38]:
> On 6/5/05, M. David Peterson <m.david.x2x2x@g...> wrote:
> > 
> > I doubt any official or non official comment could (or should) be made
> > by an MS blue badge 

> Even patents that aren't plausible money-makers on the IP licensing
> market can be very valuable to companies as *defenses* against
> nuisance lawsuits.  Look at IBM's counterclaims against  "The SCO
> Group" -- lots of patent infringement claims that IBM could not
> plausibly initiate against a competitor, but are fair game to use
> against lawsuit scammers.   The best defense in these cases is a good
> offense.  "You are suing us for infringing your patent on hashtables,
> eh?  Well, you're infringing our patents on half of Computer Science
> 101 and here's a 1000-page countersuit."  Deep sigh.
    This notion of mututually assured distruction is one that
    interests me. If frivolous patent infringment claims are met
    with like frivolous patent infringment claims, it makes the
    pursuit of such litigation unprofitable.

    If the USPTO does issue patents for ideas that are not original,
    or are quite obivous, I wounldn't mind so much, if they were
    handing them out at a price that individuals and small firms
    could afford.

    The large firms have legal departments that can churn out
    patents in volume, lowering the cost of the patent application
    process, by virtue of specialization. Good old Taylor.

    The patent application process becomes an effective barier to
    entry for the small innovators that they tout as the little guy
    that the patent office serves to protect.

    I might have an idea that is every bit as novel as something
    found at Large Firm Research, but when do I have the time, as an
    individual, to write out a patent application? I barely have
    enough time to write out my code and documentation.

    I've often thought of some sort of patent union for small
    firms, open source developers, a treaty organization. The Apache
    2.0 License does something like this.
    One could use the resource that Len has proposed, to assist
    individuals in authoring their patent applications, perhaps
    partnering with a legal team that would integrate in a way that
    their hours per application is affortable.

Alan Gutierrez - alan@e...
    - http://engrm.com/blogometer/index.html
    - http://engrm.com/blogometer/rss.2.0.xml


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.