Re: Document oriented experience reports anyone?
Bob Foster wrote: > Just for a small example, how about a subset in which > elementFormDefault="qualified" and attributeFormDefault="unqualified" > are the default and only options, as the XML Namespaces spec envisioned? I've been thinking about this for a while, trying to come up with a WXS Document Validation Profile. The problem is that, ideally, a schema that's valid for WXS DVP would still be valid and behave the same in WXS Leviathan. And while elementFormDefault is quite obviously the worst design decision ever made in a W3C specification, I don't think that adding a profiled subset that isn't interoperable with the complete beast is going to help us survive WXS more easily :) Oh for the chance to start it all over again... -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format