Re: Order of attributes
In article <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505061400090.1379@r...> you write: >Attributes, as elements, _are_ ordered in the >document, so wouldn't it be more appropriate to require a parser to report >them in order and let the application to impose an unordered semantics, if >it wishes? No, because that's not what attributes are for. The attributes of an element are uniquely identified by their names, and the children are not. The semantics of an attribute depends on its name, not its position within the start tag. You can write down a matrix of the properties of attributes and child elements: whether they are named, whether their order is significant, whether they have recursive structure (it helps to have several dimensions to write in :-). The three I listed give you 8 possible combinations; XML (and SGML) only provide two of them, but they are two that cover a lot of useful cases. >More practically, if a parser guarantees reporting attributes to the >application in their order of occurrence in a document, would this be a >reason to declare the parser incompliant with XML 1.0? No, of course not. An XML editor is the obvious example of an application that can benefit from that information. But an XML editor does not use an XML document for its semantics. -- Richard
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format