Re: More on Vector Models - Chicken and Duck talk
This > 2) To reply to David(2): Vector models are informative. There is a lot we can do without XML such as is being done with your gmail. Discussions of the models can open up innovation. It's always worth discussing. is worth discussing... This > David Lyon <david.lyon@c...> is not. On 5/2/05, Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@i...> wrote: > 1) To reply to David(1): I don't think that, but it seemed a waste of time > > to put tags around it or more smilies. OTOH, black boxes are a pretty good > place to hide bad processes. Simply hooking up SOAs won't change that. > The idea that Sarbanes-Oxley is amenable to SOA is interesting. If ever > there was an architectural challenge, that is one. > > 2) To reply to David(2): Vector models are informative. There is a lot > we can do without XML such as is being done with your gmail. Discussions > of the models can open up innovation. It's always worth discussing. > > So kill the chicken AND the duck. Keep the meat. > > len > > From: M. David Peterson [mailto:m.david.x2x2x@g...] > Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 5:24 PM > > I'll chip in a hundred just to kill this thread right here and now... > -- <M:D/> :: M. David Peterson :: XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages Specialist
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format