[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: More on Vector Models - Chicken and Duck talk

• To: "'M. David Peterson'" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>, 'David Lyon' <david.lyon@c...>
• Subject: RE: More on Vector Models - Chicken and Duck talk
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 17:43:34 -0500
• Cc: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>

1)  To reply to David(1):  I don't think that, but it seemed a waste of time

to put tags around it or more smilies.  OTOH, black boxes are a pretty good 
place to hide bad processes.  Simply hooking up SOAs won't change that. 
The idea that Sarbanes-Oxley is amenable to SOA is interesting.  If ever 
there was an architectural challenge, that is one.

2)  To reply to David(2):  Vector models are informative.   There is a lot 
we can do without XML such as is being done with your gmail.  Discussions 
of the models can open up innovation.  It's always worth discussing.

So kill the chicken AND the duck.  Keep the meat.

len


From: M. David Peterson [mailto:m.david.x2x2x@g...]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 5:24 PM

I'll chip in a hundred just to kill this thread right here and now...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: More on Vector Models - Chicken and Duck talk
    • From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>
  • Re: More on Vector Models...
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: More on Vector Models - Chicken and Duck talk
• Next by Date: Re: More on Vector Models - Chicken and Duck talk
• Previous by thread: Re: More on Vector Models - Chicken and Duck talk
• Next by thread: Re: More on Vector Models...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread