• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Subject: Re: Rigged Aggregators?
• From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
• Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:05:16 -0800
• Cc: 'Bill Kearney' <wkearney@s...>, "xml-dev@lists. xml. org" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206CC7@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206CC7@h...>
• Reply-to: lists@j...
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

> Hmmm... I have to disagree with you, Bill.  I think we 
> will see more blogs like that, and just as 'intelligent 
> design' is making its way into school science classes, 
> more superstition will be presented as credible theories 
> because those capable of refuting them refuse to take 
> the time.

Is that the point? To equate the "Rigged aggregators" blog with belief 
in God is offensive.

Jeff Rafter

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Rigged Aggregators?
    • From: "Ken North" <kennorth@s...>
  • Re: Rigged Aggregators?
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>

• References:
  • RE: Rigged Aggregators?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Rigged Aggregators?
• Next by Date: RE: Rigged Aggregators?
• Previous by thread: RE: Rigged Aggregators?
• Next by thread: Re: Rigged Aggregators?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread