• To: lists@j...
• Subject: Re: Rigged Aggregators?
• From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:14:43 -0800
• Cc: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>,'Bill Kearney' <wkearney@s...>,"xml-dev@lists. xml. org" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <4231C1BC.8090108@j...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206CC7@h...> <4231C1BC.8090108@j...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217

Jeff Rafter wrote:
>> Hmmm... I have to disagree with you, Bill.  I think we will see more 
>> blogs like that, and just as 'intelligent design' is making its way 
>> into school science classes, more superstition will be presented as 
>> credible theories because those capable of refuting them refuse to 
>> take the time.
> 
> Is that the point? To equate the "Rigged aggregators" blog with belief 
> in God is offensive.

To equate "intelligent design" with belief in God is offensive.

Bob Foster

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Rigged Aggregators?
    • From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>

• References:
  • RE: Rigged Aggregators?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: Rigged Aggregators?
    • From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XRules: Mind your own business rules
• Next by Date: Re: Rigged Aggregators?
• Previous by thread: Re: Rigged Aggregators?
• Next by thread: Re: Rigged Aggregators?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread