• To: "'David Lyon'" <david.lyon@c...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:10:38 -0000
• In-reply-to: <200503042252.27543.david.lyon@c...>
• Thread-index: AcUgr40v8YgK2iehR7OOLmCyEfYrtgAA2dZQ

> a way that the xml can easily handle what we do most... and for many
> that is transporting business data around the place.

Let's be thankful that there are people in the world who are interested in
higher things than doing business, and let's allow them to use the symbols
they have invented over the centuries.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Next by Date: RE: Do I need XML parser ?
• Previous by thread: RE: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Next by thread: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom the UCS ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread