• To: "'Rick Marshall'" <rjm@z...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 21:42:13 -0000
• In-reply-to: <4228D1A0.7060007@z...>
• Thread-index: AcUhAKKAMgvMSL7yQiuiAEzCLoCxIgAAU2hQ

> it always existed in ebcdic 

... but had a sorry history of being overlaid onto the same codepoint as
tilde and/or overline and/or macron.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom the UCS ?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Schema, BNF and parsing
• Next by Date: RE: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Previous by thread: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom the UCS ?
• Next by thread: RE: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread