[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Yeah.  This is with the assumption that the mentioned libxmlj
implementation of libxml and libxslt uses the JAXP interface to
implement a transformation as this is the impression I received from
your first post.  Is this not the case?


On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:44:05 +0100, Chris Burdess <dog@b...> wrote:
> M. David Peterson wrote:
> > Sweet!  Thanks for the info :)  I'm glad to see the agressive stance
> > to integrate this directly... I'm assuming by doing so you/they? are
> > able to shave some time off the clock?
> 
> Not really. I assume you're talking about the implementation of
> 
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/xml/transform/
> TransformerFactory.html#newInstance()
> 
> ?
> --
> Chris Burdess
> 
> 


-- 
<M:D/>

:: M. David Peterson ::
XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages Specialist

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member