• To: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>
• Subject: Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
• From: Chris Burdess <dog@b...>
• Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:44:05 +0100
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <f8da4eba05032806516da7bacf@m...>
• References: <E1DFcEL-0004ZP-00@d...> <db1e5a999923502eaceb50b06518b247@b...> <f8da4eba0503280115101d1d20@m...> <ee12f91a24d850d90d080dc79ee1fdd2@b...> <f8da4eba05032806516da7bacf@m...>

M. David Peterson wrote:
> Sweet!  Thanks for the info :)  I'm glad to see the agressive stance
> to integrate this directly... I'm assuming by doing so you/they? are
> able to shave some time off the clock?

Not really. I assume you're talking about the implementation of

    
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/xml/transform/ 
TransformerFactory.html#newInstance()

?
-- 
Chris Burdess

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
    • From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>

• References:
  • Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
    • From: Chris Burdess <dog@b...>
  • Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
    • From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>
  • Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
    • From: Chris Burdess <dog@b...>
  • Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
    • From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Quiz: static transformation vs. JIT generation
• Next by Date: RE: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
• Previous by thread: Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
• Next by thread: Re: XSLT with DOM or SAX ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread