[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>
• Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:27:35 +0400 (AMT)
• In-reply-to: <20041128180514.GA4877@c...>

John Cowan:
> David Tolpin scripsit:
> 
> > > Do any of those other schemas have a type system?  I thought the only
> > > place XQuery cared about schema was datatypes.
> > 
> > Moreover, RelaxNG is tied to XML Schema in the same way XQuery is,
> > it (Relax NG) relies on W3C XML Schema datatypes.
> 
> It doesn't *rely* on them.  They are optionally provided by particular
> RELAX NG validators.

1. Any real-word RelaxNG grammar that does not use XSD?
2. Which of usable RelaxNG validators is 'unparticular' in this respect?

The only datatype library in 'production' use for RelaxNG is XSD.

David

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• Next by Date: Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• Previous by thread: Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• Next by thread: Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread