|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention
I liked the bits about not inventing standards. It is nice to see Tim attempt to restore a meaning to the term that holds up under scrutiny, that having been a topic discussed here before. IMO, when inventing, specify; when standardizing, edit. Otherwise build running code and get yourself a market that when sufficiently diverse and hot, will then find a need to standardize. In the business I'm in, that point is being reached for in-car systems. To understand when a standard is a good idea, one needs to look at a market individually and understand the logistical, performance and market pressures. A market with two vendors and six customers usually doesn't need an ISO standard or a W3C recommendation. A market with two vendors and six customers where the customers get killed because the wrong screen colors have been applied does. (Yes, that happens. Screens that glow white and bright are excellent targets at night. Two hands on the revolver leave no hands for the touch screen.) So it varies by application and as standards wonks, we are the professionals expected to know when, where, how and who. Tim makes a good case for that kind of thinking. I agree and have said so: standards became a marketing ploy. **We made that happen. We have to clean it up.** Tim makes honest points about the 'invention' of XML. Is that a valid process for syndication formats? The comparison is not tight enough in that the syndication formats haven't been around nearly as long as SGML and its forerunners (GML, Scribe, Gencode, etc.) were. SGML had two decades to accrete but also two decades of practice so we went in to SGMLOnTheWeb with a fairly good notion of what was excisable and as you know, that didn't make the debate a whit less noisy, but the results were pretty good. So maybe it wasn't time to clean up RSS, but there sure was a lot of noise to get it done and willing hands to do it and who are we to say 'nyet'? If that is all that is required, then how DOES one say 'stick a fork in it and call it cake'? Years of experience in both technical and artistic work inform me that the hardest decision to make is 'done'. As to Atom vs RSS, that is a fight in which I don't have a dog. len
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








