[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention

  • To: "Michael Champion" <michaelc.champion@g...>,<xml-dev@l...>
  • Subject: RE: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention
  • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:31:09 -0800
  • Thread-index: AcTJA3qg8+SBU4k9RwaoL1rK20yIJAAAoTyw
  • Thread-topic: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention

cdf vs rss
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Champion [mailto:michaelc.champion@g...] 
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 1:52 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  Excellent Insight on Standards 
> Development vs Invention
> 
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:44:00 -0600, Bullard, Claude L (Len) 
> <len.bullard@i...> wrote:
> > Good stuff.  Everyone should read this.
> > 
> > http://tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/11/11/AtomInnovation
> 
> 
> Yup, good stuff.  But it raises some more questions for me:

I agree with most of it except for the fact that he actually tries to
compare RSS->Atom to SGML->XML. Trying to fix the problems with RSS by
inventing Atom isn't analogous to fixing SGML by inventing XML, its more
like fixing XML 1.0 by inventing XML 1.1 

> 
> - What does this have to do with the main critique of Atom, 
> that it just adds to the "standards" confusion without 
> solving significant real world problems?  Tim's loyal 
> opposition (mainly Dare, AFAIK) aren't saying "add more 
> unproven junk into Atom" they're saying  to not bother with 
> the Atom format standard  since the RSS mess is ugly but 
> under control; rather focus on an Atom API standard, where 
> worse is definitely NOT better.

I'd rather not have people tar me with the brush of anti-Atom advocate.
I really don't care enough about this issue to continue participating in
this discussion [which is why I unsubscribed from the various Atom
mailing lists last night]. Tim Bray made a suggestion on the list and I
disagreed with it which basically everyone else who responded on that
thread did as well. I'd rather not be the target of malicious personal
vendattas[0] because of some opinions on yet another XML syndication
format (CDF, RSS 0.91/2.0, RSS 1.0, now Atom...), enjoy the RSS vs. Atom
debates without me. 

[0] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/11/08/AttackMode

--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Airplane Law: When the plane you are on is late, the plane you want to
transfer to is on time.      

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.  

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.