[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: [Fwd: Potential Gap (WAS Re: [owl-s] communication between

• To: "'David RR Webber (XML eBusiness)'" <w3c@d...>
• Subject: RE: [Fwd: Potential Gap (WAS Re: [owl-s] communication between web services)]
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:27:08 -0500
• Cc: 'Rick Marshall' <rjm@z...>, Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@b...>, "'Thomas B. Passin'" <tpassin@c...>, xml-dev@l...

Sure.  Nothing I said suggests REST doesn't work.  It does. 
Nothing about REST suggests that it is the total solution 
for all messaging systems development, for example, systems 
that don't bind to HTTP.   I do expect many systems will. 
There are systems that will need more than the average 
security features and some will use other protocols and 
even other encodings.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnwebsrv/html/introwsa.asp

is a good overview of the WS spec set and architecture.

len


From: David RR Webber (XML eBusiness) [mailto:w3c@d...]

Len,

The ebXML Registry is using http-binding (aka REST) interfacing that 
people may
find instructive to review, and especially the use of security and 
digital certificate
management in tandem with registry.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Fwd: Potential Gap (WAS Re: [owl-s] communication between web services)]
    • From: "David RR Webber (XML eBusiness)" <w3c@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: Potential Gap (WAS Re: [owl-s] communication between web services)]
• Next by Date: RE: [Fwd: Potential Gap (WAS Re: [owl-s] communication between web services)]
• Previous by thread: RE: [Fwd: Potential Gap (WAS Re: [owl-s] communication between web services)]
• Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Potential Gap (WAS Re: [owl-s] communication between web services)]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread