|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
At 12:57 PM -0400 4/11/04, Stephen D. Williams wrote: >The improper use of an 'XML' label is a fair concern. On the other >hand, its use, qualified so as to indicate that it is something >different or additional, is a signal that something is working to >maintain a majority of semantics and idioms of XML. > Additional, fine. (Think XML Namespaces, XSLT, XML Schema, XML Query Language, xml:id, etc.) none of which in any way alter the basic nature of XML. Different: not OK. If it's not a text format fully compatible with the XML specification, then it's not XML, and please don't use the word "XML" (or preferably the initial letter X) to describe it. XML is text. XML is syntax. XML is not the infoset. The infoset is derived from XML, not the other way around. SAX and DOM are are APIs for processing XML. XML is not a serialization format for SAX and DOM. Alternate representations of the Infoset are not XML. Alternate formats that expose a SAX or DOM API are not XML. Merely maintaining the "semantics and idioms of XML" (not that I think that will actually be done when the rubber hits the road) is insufficient to justify the use of the label XML. As Tim Bray once said, "If you bring an application to market and wave the XML banner, what that means to me is that you're willing to accept input in XML, and you'll give me back information in XML, without stealing any of it." -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@m... Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








