Re: XML-appropriate editing data structures
Bryce K. Nielsen wrote: > Eh, my opinion has always been XML is Text, so why overcomplicate the > editor? The editor should be a simple but powerful text editor with some > very minor XML conveniences thrown in. Which was what prompted me to create > the xmlHack editor. It's modelled somewhat after Allaire's Homesite > application (now Macromedia's). An HTML editor with no visual bells and > whistles, just simple text. I can open a 75mb document in xmlHack in about 5 > seconds. Once open, the whole thing is highlighted, ready to go, no delays > trying to create objects. Just your text ready for your editing. Can't argue with that. If you do less, you can do it in less memory. Bob Foster http://xmlbuddy.com/ > A lot of people for and against XML don't take the time to consider the > proper usage of XML in large documents. Those I've spoken with who hate XML, > or at least feel it's used in the wrong places, are usually because they are > dealing with large documents and whatever application is processing them > crumbles (such as Microsoft's Biztalk, can't handle a document larger than > 20mb). And on the flipside, those for XML usually state things like XML is > great for small documents, instant internet communications, etc. Both sides > fail to realize that if coded properly, size matters not. > > Bryce K. Nielsen > SysOnyx, Inc. (www.sysonyx.com) > Makers of xmlHack, the Simple XML Editor > http://www.sysonyx.com/products/xmlhack
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format