Re: You call that a standard?
On Apr 28, 2004, at 8:06 AM, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > ISO is political. Extremely. They are also > process-bound which makes them reliable and > predictable. Len is having so much fun raving away on this one that I almost hate to spoil it, but the notion that ISO is "predictable" really can't be allowed to go unchallenged. Some may have forgotten those days in the early nineties when any whimsical HyTime-related theorizing could get ISOfied in weeks, in one case with insiders sitting up the night before ratification, long after the votes had been counted, hacking the query language... then there's the way that IBM used to get proprietary extensions into SQL by having small-country IBM field offices arranging to cast the votes for their countries. Which isn't to say that ISO is notably better or worse than any other organization that publishes specs. Which *is* to say that nobody is ever free of the responsibility to evaluate a specification on its merits without too damn much regard for which acronym is stamped on the side. > The VRML guys did the smart thing. They formed > a consortium to work on the technology and > liased with ISO to get the documentation process > right. It works stunningly well I'm glad to hear that VRML is working stunningly well, that word hadn't reached my neck of the woods. > What people don't get is that standardization > and technical innovation are two entirely separable > activities. I'm on board with that. -Tim
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format