[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: WS-Emperor naked?

• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:52:12 -0500
• Cc: "xml-dev@l... DEV" <xml-dev@l...>
• Organization: Booz Allen Hamilton
• References: <E1FB3A8E-84E0-11D8-ABCB-000A95A51C9E@t...>

FWIW, a few comments on/corrections to the CBDI list at [1]:

- Under the "Standard or Admin Body", there are many occurrences of "Not
yet submitted". I believe this makes the (incorrect) assumption that the
intention is to submit these specifications to ooen standards
consortiums, when that is not always the case. I would say "Not
submitted" or "Vendor specification". [This one is an opinion, not a
correction]

- WS-CAF is an OASIS TC [2], yet it's listed as "Not yet submitted"

- WS-Provisioning is really the OASIS Provisioning Services Technical
Committee (PSTC), which is not restricted to Web Services

- WS-RF is now an OASIS TC [3]

- The Liberty Alliance [4] should probably be listed, for Identity
Management

- Although not specific to Web Services, OASIS XACML [5] should also be
listed, as there is a draft Web Services Profile [6]

- I would also add WS-Discovery [7]

- and WS-MetadataExchange [8]

Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World

[1] http://roadmap.cbdiforum.com/reports/protocols/summary.php
[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ws-caf
[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=wsrf
[4] www.projectliberty.org
[5] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=xacml
[6]
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/3661/draft-xacml-wspl-04.pdf
[7]
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnglobspec/html/ws-discovery.asp
[8] http://xml.coverpages.org/WS-MetadataExchange.pdf

Tim Bray wrote:
> 
> Would anyone here like to argue that the list found in
> 
>   http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/04/01/WS-Mumble
> 
> is coherent, or sensible, or viable, or generally that the parrot is
> not dead?
> 
>   -Tim

-- 
Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz | Allen | Hamilton

• References:
  • WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• Next by Date: RE: WS-Emperor naked?
• Previous by thread: Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• Next by thread: RE: WS-Emperor naked?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread