[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: URN vs URL

• To: 'Tim Bray' <tbray@t...>, Andy Greener <andy@g...>
• Subject: RE: URN vs URL
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:10:03 -0500
• Cc: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>, xml-dev@l...

Yes, and if you put a picture of someone naked or a 
site that does, they'll pay you click through revenue.

Hey, that would pay off the debts for Iraq.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]

Andy Greener wrote:

> Supplementary question: if I was, say, a Government department, what
> would you recommend? Neither a "pin" urn or an "oid" in the UK company
> namespace seems appropriate...

Use an ordinary HTTP URI and put something useful where it points. 
Oops, sorry, that wasn't what you were asking, was it ;)

• Prev by Date: RE: URN vs URL
• Next by Date: Re: XHTML 2.0 (was DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook)
• Previous by thread: RE: URN vs URL
• Next by thread: RE: URN vs URL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread