[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)

• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill@d...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 00:39:26 +0100
• Cc: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1173AF3@R...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1173AF3@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Debating the pros and cons of XML namespaces is like arguing about whether the internal combustion engine is a good idea. The world has moved on.

In your world maybe, and good luck to ya. In my world XML Namespaces 
are being discarded as a bad idea.


> Hopefully XML-DEV will catch on to this in a few years. 

As it did with WXS or SOAP-RPC, no doubt.

Bill de hÓra

• References:
  • RE: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: rss regularis(z)ation
• Next by Date: Re: rss regularis(z)ation
• Previous by thread: Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• Next by thread: RE: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread