[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)

• To: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• Subject: Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 01:14:08 +0100
• Cc: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20030722150118.GB6242@t...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1173AF3@R...> <20030722150118.GB6242@t...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Amelia A Lewis wrote:


> Namespaces seem to have proven a bad solution to a problem (or set of
> problems).  

I think the point is that there isn't much of a problem in the first 
place. Not enough to alter XML anyway.

Bill de hÓra

• References:
  • RE: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: rss regularis(z)ation
• Next by Date: RE: the web client interface was RE: Two linkquestions
• Previous by thread: Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• Next by thread: Re: namespaces (was RE: rss regularis(z)ation)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread