[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: URN vs URL

• To: Andy Greener <andy@g...>
• Subject: Re: URN vs URL
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:55:38 -0700
• Cc: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <p05200f24bb4ddd9b19b4@[89.10.0.19]>
• References: <p05200f1bbb4da3de913e@[89.10.0.19]> <3F280C96.90C56AEF@b...> <3F28110B.4040908@a...> <p05200f24bb4ddd9b19b4@[89.10.0.19]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Andy Greener wrote:

> Supplementary question: if I was, say, a Government department, what
> would you recommend? Neither a "pin" urn or an "oid" in the UK company
> namespace seems appropriate...

Use an ordinary HTTP URI and put something useful where it points. 
Oops, sorry, that wasn't what you were asking, was it ;)

-- 
Cheers, Tim Bray
         (ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)

• References:
  • URN vs URL
    • From: Andy Greener <andy@g...>
  • Re: URN vs URL
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: URN vs URL
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: URN vs URL
    • From: Andy Greener <andy@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URN vs URL
• Next by Date: RE: URN vs URL
• Previous by thread: Re: URN vs URL
• Next by thread: Re: URN vs URL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread