[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

• To: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
• Subject: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:03:46 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1055378538.3895.33.camel@l...>
• References: <r01050400-1026-94CCBE349C6B11D79E920003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <1055378538.3895.33.camel@l...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Rick Marshall scripsit:

> Looks to me like the database debates of the 60's/70's. and xml at the
> moment is at about the same stage as codasyl etc was then.
> ..... now all we need is another ted codd .....

We have one:  MURATA Makoto.

-- 
Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so,         John Cowan
is a tax on income.  --Lord Macnaghten (1901)           jcowan@r...

• References:
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Schema question
• Next by Date: Re: SAX parser for SGML?
• Previous by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread