[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)

• To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Subject: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 18:17:25 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030604130214.03608ff8@n...>
• References: <3EDE2253.60403@e...> <5.2.0.9.0.20030604130214.03608ff8@n...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Jonathan Robie scripsit:

> Perhaps someone has a better memory than I do - I believe that the initial 
> RDF Schema was rejected because of the AC review. Is this right? Were there 
> others?

AFAIK it was never actually rejected, it just lingered in perpetual PR
(this was before CR was invented).

-- 
John Cowan                              jcowan@r...
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              http://www.reutershealth.com
Thor Heyerdahl recounts his attempt to prove Rudyard Kipling's theory
that the mongoose first came to India on a raft from Polynesia.
        --blurb for _Rikki-Kon-Tiki-Tavi_

• References:
  • Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Forming a MIME_TYPE Attribute list
• Next by Date: Re: XML 1.1 and Unicode normalization
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread