[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)

• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 18:46:11 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1026-9DB3A8CE96A911D7B5F00003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• Organization: Expway
• References: <r01050400-1026-9DB3A8CE96A911D7B5F00003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> At least in theory, the Director choice model may help with these, but
> assembling a majority of AC representatives to oppose a spec and get
> that message through seems like a difficult task at best.  

I wouldn't think so. The way I understand the process, if a number of AC reps 
clamour vigorously against a spec, something will come of it. You don't need a 
majority.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Engineer, Expway        http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Next by Date: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Voting (Was: XML Catalogs finished?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread