[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Reply-to munging

• To: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Reply-to munging
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:21:58 -0400
• In-reply-to: <E196YBa-0000bG-00@b...>

uche.ogbuji@f... (Uche Ogbuji) writes:
>The question of whether or not to munge reply-to is a guaranteed
>flame-war starter, but I just wanted to put in my 2c that XML-DEV does
>this rightly, regardless of other technical issues.

And I agree with Uche on this point, adding that I wish more people
would trim the recipients list when they reply.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Reply-to munging
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: Reply-to munging
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• References:
  • Reply-to munging
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Reply-to munging
• Next by Date: RE: FW: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid Syntacti cRig or Mortis"
• Previous by thread: Reply-to munging
• Next by thread: Re: Reply-to munging
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread